JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 25, 2004

A- de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Elva Marina Santander Vs. Gobernacion Norte De Santander

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Aclaracion Sentencia T-912/03. Negada
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Efectos inter partes
Falta De Legitimacion Por Activa En Tutela
  • Peticionario de la solicitud de aclaración de la sentencia no son parte en el proceso ni terceros con interés legítimo
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se rechazó por improcedente la solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia T-912/2003 dictada por esta Sala Primera de Revisión, toda vez que para el presente caso, se advierte una falta de legitimación de quienes presentan la petición de aclaración, por cuanto no fueron parte en el proceso ni terceros con interés legítimo en la tutela mencionada.

Contra este pronunciamiento no procede recurso alguno.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud de aclaracion de la sentencia T-912 dictada por esta Sala Primera de Revision el 8 de octubre de 2003.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR a la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion que remita copia de este auto al Juzgado
  3. Primero. Laboral del Circuito de Cucuta.
  4. Tercero. Contra este pronunciamiento no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.